Premises Liability in California: What You Need to Know

Whether you've been injured in an accident, are dealing with a personal injury claim, or facing another legal issue, Mendez & Sanchez APC is here to fight for you. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation.

Call Us Now

By Admin

9/1/2022

Property Damage

In California, if you are injured on someone else's property, the owner may be held responsible under the legal doctrine of premises liability.

Elements of a California Premises Liability Case
Individuals Held Accountable Under California Law
Who Is Responsible If You Are Hurt On Someone Else's Property?
What If Someone Gets Hurt On Your Property?
The Fundamentals of Premises Liability
Defenses Available in a Premises Liability Case
In California, Who Can Pursue a Premises Liability Claim?
What If the Property Is Not Maintained by You?
In a Premises Liability Action, What Kind of Damages Are Possible?
‍ The Statute of Limitations in California
How to File a Premises Liability Lawsuit in California?
What Are the Most Prevalent Claims for Premises Liability?
Do Property Owners Owe Trespassers a Duty of Care?
Conclusion

The property owner must take reasonable steps to protect visitors from foreseeable harm. If the property owner doesn't do so and you are hurt, the owner may be held accountable for your losses.

The extent to which property owners can be held accountable for injuries on their land varies from state to state.

Here are some of the most important California premises liability requirements and when you should seek legal advice from a premises liability lawyer in Los Angeles.

Elements of a California Premises Liability Case

Premises liability in California is founded on the owner's or possessor's carelessness. The duty of property owners to provide "ordinary care" is covered in California Civil Code 1714, which emphasizes that everyone is responsible for this requirement.

This statute applies to injuries resulting from failure to exercise ordinary care. The following critical factors must exist to establish a premises liability personal injury claim against a property owner:

The defendant owns or controls the property.
The defendant was negligent in exerting "ordinary care" to avoid damage.
The plaintiff was hurt as a result of the property's irresponsible care.
Negligence played a substantial role in the cause of the harm.

For a person to establish a legal claim under California premises liability standards, some crucial indicators must be present.

Suppose the property owner disregarded their "duty of care" to prevent injury. In that case, they might be held accountable for damages such as medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and other losses.

Individuals Held Accountable Under California Law

Property owners are not the only people who can be held accountable for accidents caused by dangerous infrastructure.

Depending on the circumstances, everyone who rents, leases, owns, or works on the property may be held accountable.

For instance, if a customer slips and then falls in a restaurant on a wet floor and is injured, the restaurant owner, not the property owner, may be held liable.

In California, the individual or corporation responsible for the property's upkeep is held accountable. This could be a group of individuals or entities in some circumstances.

If you are harmed on commercial or residential property in California due to unsafe property conditions, you may be able to seek compensation.

Who Is Responsible If You Are Hurt On Someone Else's Property?

Premises liability laws govern who is liable for injuries on the property of a landowner, lessor, or occupier.

What If Someone Gets Hurt On Your Property?

What happens if you get hurt on someone else's property? Do you have legal standing to sue the landowner? What about the property owner?

A set of regulations addressing these problems is called "premises liability." Although every state recognizes some premises liability, the specific rules differ by state.

The Fundamentals of Premises Liability

In California, a person who owns, leases, occupies, or controls a premise is negligent if they fail to do one of the following two things:

Take the appropriate procedures to protect the property.
Use reasonable caution when discovering potentially dangerous circumstances and repairing, replacing, or properly warning of anything that could reasonably be expected to cause harm to others.

The court may consider the following elements in determining whether the owner, lessor, or occupier exercised reasonable care:

The property's location
The possibility of someone visiting the property
There is a chance of injury.
The likelihood of severe harm
Whether the defendant was aware of the harmful condition or should have been aware of it.
The difficulty of defending against such a threat.
The defendant's level of control over the scenario put people in danger.

Premises liability claims can be filed for various reasons, such as dog attacks, swimming pool accidents, and slips and falls.

Defenses Available in a Premises Liability Case

If a landowner, lessor, or occupier can demonstrate one of the following scenarios, they may avoid liability in a premises liability action:

The hazardous situation was open and obvious (a condition is "open and obvious" if a reasonable person should have observed and avoided it).
That the wounded individual was aware of the potentially dangerous circumstance before being injured
That the injury was caused by a little, negligible, or minor deficiency in the property (this is sometimes called the "trivial defect defense")

In California, Who Can Pursue a Premises Liability Claim?

In most cases, anyone (even trespassers) who is hurt on someone else's property can pursue a premises liability claim if they believe carelessness is a contributing factor.

When someone is killed on someone else's property, the deceased's family members may file a wrongful death claim to collect funeral expenses, lost future wages, companionship, and other damages.

What If the Property Is Not Maintained by You?

A landowner's duty is not delegable in California. This means that even if the landowner hires someone to manage the property and the hired person fails to do so safely, the landowner is still accountable for any injury caused by the hired person.

In a Premises Liability Action, What Kind of Damages Are Possible?

If you are found to be at fault in your case, you may be able to get compensation for the following:

Anguish and pain
Measures of punishment (in rare cases)
Medical treatment in the past and the future
Wages lost
Emotional anguish

‍The Statute of Limitations in California

In most premises liability cases, the injured party has two years to file a lawsuit from the date of the harm. If the injured person fails to submit a lawsuit within the time limit, their case will be dismissed, and they will not be reimbursed.

The 2-year statute of limitations has a few exceptions. If the victim is suing the government, they must file an administrative claim within six months.

Another exemption is if the injured individual is under 18, in which case the statute of limitations will not start running until the injured person reaches the age of 18.

The best approach to ensure that your claim is filed on time is to seek the advice of an experienced California attorney as soon as possible following the injury.

How to File a Premises Liability Lawsuit in California?

Any injuries caused on the property may be held liable by a negligent property owner or occupier who fails to keep the property reasonably safe. The injured party may be entitled to sue the property owner for damages in a personal injury action.

What Are the Most Prevalent Claims for Premises Liability?

Premises liability accidents can happen on almost any property, including your own.

Parks, office buildings, stores and malls, parking spaces, houses, and private homes are all examples of government property.

Do Property Owners Owe Trespassers a Duty of Care?

A property owner's duty to a trespasser in California varies depending on the situation and the source of the injury. In some regions, the degree of responsibility owed is determined by the individual's position on the land. However, in California, duty is no longer classified based on the following status:

Invader
Licensee
Trespasser

Instead, the jury would look at all relevant elements to determine whether the property owner took reasonable precautions to preserve the property in a reasonably safe state. Here are a few examples:

The property's location; the potential of a trespasser visiting the property; the possibility and degree of harm.

Conclusion

Premises liability in California is governed by a complex set of laws. Understanding these laws is essential for businesses and property owners to minimize liability exposure. Additionally, individuals injured on someone else's property should be aware of the legal principles that may apply to their case and consult with a personal injury lawyer.

Our attorneys and staff members at Mendez and Sanchez Law are here to help you as we traverse the difficult legal landscape to secure the restitution you deserve. If you have a Personal Injury, Premises Liability Claims, Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Slip and Fall, or other legal difficulties, please contact us immediately!

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to file a premises liability lawsuit in California?

In California, you generally have two years from the date of your injury to file a premises liability lawsuit, as established under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1. However, if your injury occurred on government-owned property — such as a city sidewalk, public school, or county park — you must file a government tort claim with the responsible agency within just six months of the incident under the California Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 911.2). Missing either of these deadlines can permanently bar you from recovering compensation, so it's critical to speak with a premises liability attorney as soon as possible after your injury.

What kind of compensation can I actually recover in a California premises liability case?

In a successful California premises liability case, you may be entitled to both economic and non-economic damages, which can include medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, loss of earning capacity, physical therapy costs, and compensation for pain and suffering under California Civil Code Section 3333. In cases involving particularly reckless or malicious conduct by the property owner, a court may also award punitive damages under California Civil Code Section 3294. The total value of your claim depends heavily on the severity of your injuries, the clarity of the owner's negligence, and how well your losses are documented — which is one of the most important reasons to preserve medical records, photographs, and incident reports from day one.

I slipped and fell at a grocery store in Los Angeles — does the store have to pay even if they say they didn't know about the spill?

California law does not require that a store manager personally knew about a dangerous condition for the business to be held liable — it's enough to show that the hazard existed long enough that a reasonable inspection would have discovered it, a standard often called 'constructive notice.' Under California Civil Code Section 1714, property owners and businesses have a continuous duty to inspect, maintain, and correct unsafe conditions on their premises. In Los Angeles County courts, slip and fall cases against large retailers are common, and evidence like surveillance footage, store inspection logs, and employee statements can be powerful in proving the store failed its duty of care — so acting quickly to preserve that evidence is essential.

Can I sue if I was trespassing when I got hurt on someone's property in California?

Yes, even trespassers have some legal protections under California premises liability law, though the standard is lower than for invited guests. Under California Civil Code Section 1714 and the framework established in Rowland v. Christian (1968), property owners generally cannot willfully or wantonly injure trespassers, and they owe a heightened duty of care to child trespassers under the 'attractive nuisance' doctrine — meaning that if a child was lured onto the property by something like an unfenced pool or playground equipment, the owner may still be fully liable. If you or your child were hurt while trespassing, your ability to recover compensation depends on the specific circumstances, and consulting with a premises liability attorney is the best way to understand your options.

What mistakes do people make after getting injured on someone else's property that hurt their case?

One of the most damaging mistakes is failing to report the injury to the property owner or manager at the time of the incident — without an official report, the owner can later claim they had no knowledge of the event or the hazardous condition. Equally harmful is delaying medical treatment, which gives insurance companies grounds to argue that your injuries weren't serious or weren't caused by the accident. In California, where comparative fault rules under Civil Code Section 1431.2 can reduce your compensation based on your share of responsibility, posting about the accident on social media is another critical mistake, as insurers routinely monitor claimants' accounts to find statements or photos that undermine the severity of injuries.

My landlord has ignored my complaints about a broken staircase and I fell — is that considered negligence in California?

Absolutely — in California, landlords have a statutory duty to maintain rental properties in a habitable and safe condition under California Civil Code Section 1941, and failing to repair a known hazard like a broken staircase after receiving documented complaints is a strong indicator of negligence. When you can show that you notified the landlord in writing (through texts, emails, or letters) and the repair was ignored, those communications become powerful evidence of both the landlord's knowledge and their failure to exercise ordinary care under California Civil Code Section 1714. This type of case, where there is clear written notice, often results in significant settlements, and you may be entitled to compensation for your medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.

Does it matter what type of visitor I was — like if I was invited versus just wandering onto the property?

Yes, your legal status as a visitor on the property traditionally affected the duty of care owed to you under premises liability law, with invitees (customers, guests) historically receiving the highest protection, licensees (social guests) receiving moderate protection, and trespassers receiving the least. However, California courts largely moved away from this rigid classification system after the landmark California Supreme Court decision in Rowland v. Christian (1968), which established that property owners owe a general duty of reasonable care to all people on their property under California Civil Code Section 1714. Today, California courts weigh multiple factors to determine whether a property owner acted reasonably — including the foreseeability of harm and the owner's ability to prevent it — meaning that even if you weren't formally invited, you may still have a strong premises liability claim.